receipt racer from d_effekt on Vimeo.
Showing posts with label tech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tech. Show all posts
Monday, June 20, 2011
Most awesome waste of paper ever.
This is a game that was rigged up using a thermal paper printer to provide a track, a light projector to provide the player car, a PS3 controller for user input, and a laptop to link all three. Pretty crazy, check it out:
Monday, November 22, 2010
Laying a brick road - inkjet style.
This is a video of a crazy machine that is used to lay brick roads. Check it out.
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Equally awesome but more readable watch
This watch is great as well. I'm not sure how I feel about the overall form factor, but the dial itself is fantastic. The idea is that the hands are joined into a single line, with the thick end marking hours and the thin end minutes. Simple, and perfect. More pics at the source, click the pic.
Awesome unreadable watch
I love this watch. You can be certain that when you can use it to tell time at a glance and no one else can see diddly, all bystanders will be suitably impressed. Click the pic below for more details.
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Monday, February 15, 2010
The future is here! Laser mosquito defense!
Whats more entertaining on a Friday night than sitting on the porch and watching the bug zapper? How about a system that fries up to 100 mosquitoes per second, MID-FLIGHT, with **LASERS**. Yeah.

Video below, but if you're a filthy mosquito sympathizer you may be disturbed. And you'll deserve it.

Robots are better than you. At the rubik's cube.
Unless you are the world record holder with a seven second solve, the Lego Mindstorm robot below probably has you beat. I'm not sure if I should be more jealous of the robot's solve time or of the robot's owner.
Robots will be killing you shortly.
Well, some idiot has given the machines the ability to make art. They can take a picture of you, and then sketch your portrait. The human race is officially obsolete. Check out the vid below for evidence of your impending demise.
Friday, January 22, 2010
The future of desktop interaction?
Monday, January 11, 2010
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Quality engineering at work
This is an example of some very well thought out engineering. You know those LED traffic lights that are popping up everywhere? Nice and bright with a really low power draw? Well guess what? That low power draw means that the bulbs no longer produce heat. THAT means that the traffic lights don't melt the snow that drifts into them, an issue that was never a problem with the horrendously inefficient and hot running incandescent lamps. This means that the colder states are now seeing crashes, and apparently even one fatality, as a result of the snow blocked lights. Fun!


Thursday, December 10, 2009
AT&T to limit iPhone data plans?
It seems that AT&T is regretting the unlimited data plans that are provided to all iPhone customers. Due to a small percentage (three percent) of extremely high bandwidth usage customers, the available 3g bandwidth for the entire network is being reduced by 40%. They say this is due to high bandwidth video streaming applications such as CNN's mobile app. As a result of this imbalance, AT&T wants to impose a limit on smartphone monthly bandwidth, such as the one that exists for their connection cards. Will it fly? At this point, who knows. Will there be fallout if it does? Let me say this: When AT&T loses their exclusive hold on the iPhone, I for one don't plan on sticking around.
Monday, December 7, 2009
Nook reviews are coming in
Well, Engadget has its review up for the much anticipated e-reader, the Barnes & Noble nook. They cover the device very thoroughly, and include a video of the interface in action. If you have any interest in the nook in particular or e-readers in general, I recommend taking a look.

If you'd prefer the short version:
Pros: It's pretty. The available library is huge, and buying books is an excellent experience. Dual screens are a solid benefit.
Cons: It's slow. Interface is clunky, and occasionally buggy.
Basically, its a solid offering considering that e-reader tech is still in its infancy, but it isn't quite the kindle-killer some of us were hoping for.

If you'd prefer the short version:
Pros: It's pretty. The available library is huge, and buying books is an excellent experience. Dual screens are a solid benefit.
Cons: It's slow. Interface is clunky, and occasionally buggy.
Basically, its a solid offering considering that e-reader tech is still in its infancy, but it isn't quite the kindle-killer some of us were hoping for.
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Ewwww...
Sorry about the recent lack of updates folks. On one hand there has been a lack of particularly interesting nerd news lately, and on the other I've been delving into the Wheel of Time again, and so have procrastinated in writing the *THREE* game reviews that I need to get up here. In the mean time, an interesting if unsettling tidbit:
It seems that there are some doctors out there who can cure certain types of blindness with... get this... TEETH. I'm not kidding. They extract one of the patients teeth, drill a hole in it, and then place an artificial lens in the hole. The whole mess is then implanted in the eye, with somewhat disconcerting results. The tooth is necessary to avoid the rejection that would take place with an artificial base.

You cant make this stuff up people. Video below, but be warned: it's a tad graphic.
It seems that there are some doctors out there who can cure certain types of blindness with... get this... TEETH. I'm not kidding. They extract one of the patients teeth, drill a hole in it, and then place an artificial lens in the hole. The whole mess is then implanted in the eye, with somewhat disconcerting results. The tooth is necessary to avoid the rejection that would take place with an artificial base.

You cant make this stuff up people. Video below, but be warned: it's a tad graphic.
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Impressive case mod turns Xbox into PC... and Mac?
This is an impressive video of an industrious modder with an old xbox case, $1500 worth of parts, and a lot of know how making himself a machine capable of booting both Windows 7 and Mac OSX. A fascinating watch.
Monday, November 23, 2009
Rapid Model Acquisition coming to a webcam near you!
Normally the process of translating a physical object into a three dimensional computerized format has one of two approaches: slow, painstaking manual recreation by a human modeler and texture artist, or rapid acquisition using an incredibly expensive array of lasers and cameras. Well, thanks to Cambridge Engineering student Qi Pan, there is now a simpler answer: your average webcam. Check out the video below, or some further examples here.
This technology, with some refinement, could be revolutionary across any number of fields. Imagine the archaeologist able to map and piece together pottery or bone fragments on the fly in the field with nothing but his laptop. Imagine museum curators creating online repositories of their entire collection to be toured on the web. Imagine game developers using figures and sculptures to instantly create models for their games rather than wringing them from the ether manually.
This technology, with some refinement, could be revolutionary across any number of fields. Imagine the archaeologist able to map and piece together pottery or bone fragments on the fly in the field with nothing but his laptop. Imagine museum curators creating online repositories of their entire collection to be toured on the web. Imagine game developers using figures and sculptures to instantly create models for their games rather than wringing them from the ether manually.
This could be very, very big.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Google Chrome OS shows its face
So the first public look at Google's Chrome OS happened this morning. Is it everything that anyone could hope or dream? As a grudgingly admitted Google fanboy, I'm a little surprised that my answer is:
"Meh."
Frankly, I'm not overly impressed. Google's approach is a good one and addresses some real problems, and of course there are some very nice bells and whistles, but it just isn't anything I'd ever use in a day to day situation.
Google's basic idea is something along the lines of "What if the entire PC experience were based on the web?" What this translates to in reality is "How much functionality can you squeeze into a web browser?" Literally the entirety of the Google OS as it stands right now is a souped up version of their Chrome browser. All applications are pure web apps (Gmail, Google Docs, etc) and each of them gets a tab. Background processes like chat happen in popup windows like Google talk does in current Gmail. File interaction is either all stored online, or pulled off of USB media on the fly via another popup window.
This setup does offer advantages. For example, since all of your data is on the web, the machine you use is irrelevant. Log into a Chrome OS machine anywhere and you'll have all your stuff. Because the browser is the only resident program, it also means the system boots up EXTREMELY quickly. Also, because of the enclosed setup, security is much stronger. Basically the system knows what programs are SUPPOSED to be allowed, and nothing else will run.
This, of course, is the rub. If it doesn't run in your current browser, it wont run on a Chrome machine AT ALL. That means no Photoshop, no full scale games, no stored media watching... nothing. If you cant do it online, you cant do it.
Is this perfect for someone who only wants to check email and play bejeweled with their $400 netbook? Possibly. However, while the Chrome OS is open source and therefore free, it targets only specific hardware. This means you cant just drop it on your existing machine. You have to buy a new one with the software in place. Since you're going to fork out the dough anyway, is there a point in choosing this system over one that offers a more robust experience, even in the netbook realm? Debatable.
Google justifies all this by saying that they don't expect their OS to serve as a primary machine, but as a companion to a machine with a more traditional OS. They want to fill the niche for simple online use in a more mobile device. Wait, isn't that what increasingly ubiquitous smartphones are for? I can easily do with my iPhone most of what the Chrome OS will do, with the exception of file access via USB. Why would I need another entire computer just to occupy the same niche?
Frankly, I love the slick look and feel of the system and some of the features are wonderful. If they added this functionality to the existing Chrome browser they'd have even more than the current 40 million users pounding their servers I'm quite sure. Does it really have a place in the world as a standalone system though? I dunno. We'll see.
"Meh."
Frankly, I'm not overly impressed. Google's approach is a good one and addresses some real problems, and of course there are some very nice bells and whistles, but it just isn't anything I'd ever use in a day to day situation.
Google's basic idea is something along the lines of "What if the entire PC experience were based on the web?" What this translates to in reality is "How much functionality can you squeeze into a web browser?" Literally the entirety of the Google OS as it stands right now is a souped up version of their Chrome browser. All applications are pure web apps (Gmail, Google Docs, etc) and each of them gets a tab. Background processes like chat happen in popup windows like Google talk does in current Gmail. File interaction is either all stored online, or pulled off of USB media on the fly via another popup window.
This setup does offer advantages. For example, since all of your data is on the web, the machine you use is irrelevant. Log into a Chrome OS machine anywhere and you'll have all your stuff. Because the browser is the only resident program, it also means the system boots up EXTREMELY quickly. Also, because of the enclosed setup, security is much stronger. Basically the system knows what programs are SUPPOSED to be allowed, and nothing else will run.
This, of course, is the rub. If it doesn't run in your current browser, it wont run on a Chrome machine AT ALL. That means no Photoshop, no full scale games, no stored media watching... nothing. If you cant do it online, you cant do it.
Is this perfect for someone who only wants to check email and play bejeweled with their $400 netbook? Possibly. However, while the Chrome OS is open source and therefore free, it targets only specific hardware. This means you cant just drop it on your existing machine. You have to buy a new one with the software in place. Since you're going to fork out the dough anyway, is there a point in choosing this system over one that offers a more robust experience, even in the netbook realm? Debatable.
Google justifies all this by saying that they don't expect their OS to serve as a primary machine, but as a companion to a machine with a more traditional OS. They want to fill the niche for simple online use in a more mobile device. Wait, isn't that what increasingly ubiquitous smartphones are for? I can easily do with my iPhone most of what the Chrome OS will do, with the exception of file access via USB. Why would I need another entire computer just to occupy the same niche?
Frankly, I love the slick look and feel of the system and some of the features are wonderful. If they added this functionality to the existing Chrome browser they'd have even more than the current 40 million users pounding their servers I'm quite sure. Does it really have a place in the world as a standalone system though? I dunno. We'll see.
Windows 7 install times
Just an FYI: It takes about 5 times longer to upgrade from Vista to 7 than it does to install a fresh instance. Also, heaven help you if you lose power midway through the process.
Monday, November 16, 2009
Holy Micro Flash Drive Batman!
Check this out folks: This is a flash drive that holds 16 GB. Thats roughly *23 CD's* worth of data. On this little bitty slip of plastic. Better yet, its only $40 on amazon for this whopper, and there are cheaper models with less capacity. Christmas ideas anyone?


Friday, November 13, 2009
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)